Bush's Vietnam?

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:44, November 15, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed source, URL)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Rich Lowry
Source National Review
Date August 15, 2006
URL http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjE4NDhmOWY5MTc4MjNkYjc5NjE4MGFiOTUxZjAzMTA=
Quote
Quotes-start.png "...the violence in Iraq has belied the rhetoric of progress and prevented any reduction in troops. Bush would be much better served by forthrightly acknowledging Iraq’s distressing circumstances and backing an all-out push to secure Baghdad even if it takes thousands more American troops in the country." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should change its approach on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.