Bush must call for reinforcements in Iraq: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Item | ||
|author=Robert Kagan | |author=Robert Kagan, William Kristol | ||
|source=Financial Times | |source=Financial Times | ||
|date=November 12, 2006 | |date=November 12, 2006 | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="Instead of looking for a face-saving way to lose in Iraq, President Bush could finally demand of his top advisers a strategy to succeed: provide the US force levels necessary to achieve even minimal political objectives. This could begin by increasing US troops in Iraq by at least 50,000 in order to clear and hold Baghdad without shifting troops from other parts of Iraq." | |quote="Instead of looking for a face-saving way to lose in Iraq, President Bush could finally demand of his top advisers a strategy to succeed: provide the US force levels necessary to achieve even minimal political objectives. This could begin by increasing US troops in Iraq by at least 50,000 in order to clear and hold Baghdad without shifting troops from other parts of Iraq." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|for}} | ||
{{Opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Coalition troops should pull out|against}} | |||
{{ |
Latest revision as of 12:19, March 30, 2009
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Robert Kagan, William Kristol |
---|---|
Source | Financial Times |
Date | November 12, 2006 |
URL | http://www.ft.com/cms/s/8a848c2e-7278-11db-a5f5-0000779e2340.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.
This item argues against the position Coalition troops should pull out on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.