Cap and trade is wrong solution

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:27, June 28, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=The Denver Post editorial board |source=The Denver Post |date=June 26, 2009 |url=http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12691197 |quote="Fashioned to avoid appearing')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Denver Post editorial board
Source The Denver Post
Date June 26, 2009
URL http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12691197
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Fashioned to avoid appearing like a new tax, the measure nevertheless would work like one, as the higher costs of meeting the caps get passed on to consumers. The measure risks hurting our competitiveness globally without effectively lowering global greenhouse gases. Congress should instead consider a simpler carbon tax, creating a "nuclear-arms race" to harness atomic power to replace fossil fuels and provide incentives to speed new-energy innovation." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic American Clean Energy and Security Act.