Clinton easily the best candidate for president

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:15, November 8, 2016 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board, |source=The Philadelphia Inquirer |date=October 21, 2016 |url=http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/Inquirer-Editorial...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board
Source The Philadelphia Inquirer
Date October 21, 2016
URL http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/Inquirer-Editorial-Clinton-easily-the-best-candidate-for-president.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png Take spending, for example. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said neither candidate would reverse the growth of spending, but while Clinton’s policies would add $200 billion to the debt by 2026, Trump’s policies would increase it by $5.3 trillion. The national debt would rise to 86 percent of GDP under Clinton (compared to 77 percent now), but Trump would drive it up to 105 percent of GDP. Aren’t Republicans supposed to be more fiscally prudent? Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Hillary Clinton should be elected on the topic United States presidential election, 2016.


This item argues against the position Donald Trump should be elected on the topic United States presidential election, 2016.