Confirm John Bolton: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
|date=November 14, 2006
|date=November 14, 2006
|url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0611140193nov14,0,1316255.story
|url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0611140193nov14,0,1316255.story
|quote=" Bolton has played the role of a proper diplomat, but he has also been blunt about the tremendous need for UN reform in the wake of the oil-for-food scandal and the world body's continued coddling of police states on agencies such as the Commission on Human Rights."
|quote="Bolton has played the role of a proper diplomat, but he has also been blunt about the tremendous need for UN reform in the wake of the oil-for-food scandal and the world body's continued coddling of police states on agencies such as the Commission on Human Rights."
}}
}}


{{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Bolton should be confirmed|for}}
{{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Bolton should be confirmed|for}}

Latest revision as of 13:03, December 5, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Chicago Tribune editorial board
Source Chicago Tribune
Date November 14, 2006
URL http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0611140193nov14,0,1316255.story
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Bolton has played the role of a proper diplomat, but he has also been blunt about the tremendous need for UN reform in the wake of the oil-for-food scandal and the world body's continued coddling of police states on agencies such as the Commission on Human Rights." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.