Confirm John Bolton: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=November 14, 2006 | |date=November 14, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0611140193nov14,0,1316255.story | |url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0611140193nov14,0,1316255.story | ||
|quote=" Bolton has played the role of a proper diplomat, but he has also been blunt about the tremendous need for UN reform in the wake of the oil-for-food scandal and the world body's continued coddling of police states on agencies such as the Commission on Human Rights." | |quote="Bolton has played the role of a proper diplomat, but he has also been blunt about the tremendous need for UN reform in the wake of the oil-for-food scandal and the world body's continued coddling of police states on agencies such as the Commission on Human Rights." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Bolton should be confirmed|for}} | {{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Bolton should be confirmed|for}} |
Latest revision as of 13:03, December 5, 2006
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Chicago Tribune editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Chicago Tribune |
Date | November 14, 2006 |
URL | http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0611140193nov14,0,1316255.story |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.