Confirm Kavanaugh

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:27, December 28, 2018 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=National Review editorial board |source=National Review |date=September 28, 2018 |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/confirm-kavanaugh/ |quote=Two weeks...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) National Review editorial board
Source National Review
Date September 28, 2018
URL https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/confirm-kavanaugh/
Quote
Quotes-start.png Two weeks ago, what we knew of Judge Kavanaugh suggested that he is a man of immense talent, impeccable temperament, and excellent character. Nothing that has happened in the intervening days, certainly not Kavanaugh’s warranted anger today, has altered our view. “Judge” and “Defendant” are two wholly discrete roles, which is why judges recuse themselves when their personal affairs and those of the court intersect. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Kavanaugh should be confirmed on the topic Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination.