Page values for "Contempt Of Courts"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJune 17, 2008 5:08:14 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJune 17, 2008 5:08:14 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=George F. Will |source=The Washington Post |date=June 17, 2008 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/16/AR2008061602041.html |quote="As the conservative and libertarian Cato Institute argued in its amicus brief in support of the petitioning detainees, ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringContempt Of Courts
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger4,392
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger4,392
_pageNamePageContempt Of Courts
_pageTitleString

Contempt Of Courts

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageBoumediene v. Bush
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageBoumediene v. Bush / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,George F. Will
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateJune 17, 2008
URLURLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/16/AR2008061602041.html
QuoteText"As the conservative and libertarian Cato Institute argued in its amicus brief in support of the petitioning detainees, habeas, in the context of U.S. constitutional law, "is a separation of powers principle" involving the judicial and executive branches. The latter cannot be the only judge of its own judgment."
SummaryWikitext

Contempt Of Courts by George F. Will (The Washington Post, June 17, 2008) (view)