Page values for "Counter Gadhafi with coordinated response"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeMarch 13, 2011 5:20:08 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeMarch 13, 2011 6:05:10 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=USA Today editorial board, |source=USA Today |date=February 24, 2011 |url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2011-02-24-editorial24_ST_N.htm |quote=Military intervention? The Iraq invasion was just the most recent example of how much easier it is to get into a war than o ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger2
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringCounter Gadhafi with coordinated response
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger7,457
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger7,457
_pageNamePageCounter Gadhafi with coordinated response
_pageTitleString

Counter Gadhafi with coordinated response

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPage2011 Libyan uprising
Position_fragmentStringUnited States should impose a no-fly zone
PositionPage2011 Libyan uprising / United States should impose a no-fly zone
Position_linkWikitext

United States should impose a no-fly zone

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,USA Today editorial board
SourcePageUSA Today
DateDateFebruary 24, 2011
URLURLhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2011-02-24-editorial24_ST_N.htm
QuoteTextMilitary intervention? The Iraq invasion was just the most recent example of how much easier it is to get into a war than out of one. A more limited show of force? In 1983, the United States inserted a small Marines barracks in a spectacularly foolish attempt to calm a Lebanese civil war. A terrorist bomb killed 241, prompting a swift retreat. There is time to get it right in Libya.
SummaryWikitext

Counter Gadhafi with coordinated response by USA Today editorial board (USA Today, February 24, 2011) (view)