From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:24, August 7, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=National Review editorial board |source=National Review |date=August 7, 2008 |url= |quote="O...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) National Review editorial board
Source National Review
Date August 7, 2008
Quotes-start.png "Of course, Hamdan was not alleged to have carried out specific acts of terror. His functions in al-Qaeda were the critical ones of enabling bin Laden to operate; to meet and plan attacks with top deputies like KSM; and to protect the mobile command structure so the terror network would survive even if the United States retaliated after jihadist atrocities. On his performance of this role, the evidence of guilt was overwhelming." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position Trial was fair on the topic Trial of Salim Hamdan.