Die Another Day

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:55, April 6, 2014 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Richard L. Hasen |source=Slate |date=April 2, 2014 |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/04/the_subtle_awfulness_of_the_mccutc...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Richard L. Hasen
Source Slate
Date April 2, 2014
URL http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/04/the_subtle_awfulness_of_the_mccutcheon_v_fec_campaign_finance_decision_the.html
Quotes-start.png Third and most dramatically, the court seems to open the door for a future challenge to what remains of the McCain-Feingold law: the ban on large, “soft money” contributions collected by political parties. These contributions were banned because it had become clear that political parties were becoming conduits for access between elected officials and big donors. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Supreme Court voted correctly on the topic McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.