Emergency Over, Saith the Court

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:52, September 18, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charles Krauthammer
Source The Washington Post
Date July 7, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/06/AR2006070601552.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "All rise: The Supreme Court has decreed a return to normality. A lovely idea, except that al-Qaeda has other ideas. The war does go on. One can sympathize with the court's desire for a Harding-like restoration to normalcy. But the robed eminences are premature. And even if they weren't, they really didn't have to issue a ruling this bad." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.