Gaza after a Hamas rout will be an even greater threat to Israel

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:03, January 7, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=Jonathan Freedland |source=The Guardian |date=January 7, 2009 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/07/gaza-palestine-israel |quote="For Gaza could become a ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jonathan Freedland
Source The Guardian
Date January 7, 2009
URL http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/07/gaza-palestine-israel
Quote
Quotes-start.png "For Gaza could become a vacuum, rapidly descending into Somalia, a lawless badland of warlords and clans. A new force could seek to replace Hamas. Most likely it would be even more radical: al-Qaida has long been pushing at the edges of Gaza, eager to find a way in. Would either of those options appeal to Israel? Of course they wouldn't." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict.