Geneva Contention

This is an opinion item.

Author(s)	The Wall Street Journal editorial board
Source	The Wall Street Journal
Date	September 18, 2006
URL	http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008959
Quote	"What's more, the definition of an "outrage" is context-dependent. What's outrageous when dealing with the likes of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, or a terrorist who might know about imminent plots, is clearly different than what's outrageous when dealing with a lawful combatant or prisoner of war."

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.

This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.

This item argues against the position Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.