Greener farm bill also better

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 20:42, May 15, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The Denver Post editorial board |source=The Denver Post |date=May 11, 2008 |url=http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_9227232 |quote="Perhaps the most important improvement i...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Denver Post editorial board
Source The Denver Post
Date May 11, 2008
URL http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_9227232
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Perhaps the most important improvement in the new farm bill is a reduction in a per-gallon ethanol tax credit that supports blending fuel with the corn-based additive from 51 cents to 45 cents. That cut helps pay for a Salazar-sponsored $1.01 per gallon production tax credit through 2012 for biofuels produced from renewable cellulosic feedstock. This is a first-time incentive for cellulosic biofuels, which Salazar estimates "have the potential to displace 3.5 billion barrels of oil annually, equivalent to 60 percent of our country's yearly consumption of oil, without affecting our need for food, feed or fiber." " Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Bill should be passed on the topic 2007 U.S. Farm Bill.