Hamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court should rule in Hamdan's favor

From Discourse DB
< Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Revision as of 15:23, September 28, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Position: Supreme Court should rule in Hamdan's favor

This position addresses the topic Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.

For this position

No results

Against this position

Quotes-start.png "But regardless of the jurisdictional question, Hamdan should not be hard to decide on the merits. Hamdan is an illegal combatant, and President Bush is well within both the bounds of congressional authorization and the tradition of presidential wartime powers in ordering that he be tried by military commission." Quotes-end.png
From Court to Commission, by National Review editorial board (National Review, March 28, 2006) (view)

Mixed on this position

No results