Health reform's reality vs. its parody

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 11:37, October 5, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=E. J. Dionne |source=The Washington Post |date=October 4, 2010 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/03/AR2010100302567.html |quote="In...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) E. J. Dionne
Source The Washington Post
Date October 4, 2010
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/03/AR2010100302567.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "In fact, there are two "health-care bills" competing in this election. One is the parody Republicans have lovingly created that casts the health-care law as a big-government monstrosity with no redeeming features. The other is the law itself, an admittedly sprawling legislative compromise that nonetheless moves things in the right direction -- and most of whose individual elements voters support." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.