High Court should strike down shot mandates

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:39, March 2, 2022 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Detroit News editorial board |source=The Detroit News |date=January 5, 2022 |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2022/01/06/editorial-high-court-should-strike-down-shot-mandates/9105746002/ |quote=Breakthrough cases are becoming more common, and vaccines alone will not stop the spread. A better approach would be to focus on ensuring states have adequate access to testing and the early virus treatments that are coming online. Such e...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Detroit News editorial board
Source The Detroit News
Date January 5, 2022
URL https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2022/01/06/editorial-high-court-should-strike-down-shot-mandates/9105746002/
Quote
Quotes-start.png Breakthrough cases are becoming more common, and vaccines alone will not stop the spread. A better approach would be to focus on ensuring states have adequate access to testing and the early virus treatments that are coming online. Such expansive federal mandates go against our system of federalism and our constitutional rights, and are unlikely to significantly slow the virus. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court should rule in OSHA's favor on the topic National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=High_Court_should_strike_down_shot_mandates&oldid=33452"