Hold Iran nuclear negotiators to their word: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Boston Globe editorial board, |source=The Boston Globe |date=June 26, 2015 |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/06/26/hold-iranian-nucle...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote=If Iran is allowed to backtrack on its commitments now, it doesn’t bode well for compliance in the future. A vague, unverifiable deal won’t pass muster with the US Congress. If the nuclear deal needs a presidential veto to survive, then it may be too fragile to outlast this administration. That’s not in Iran’s interests, or the interests of the United States. | |quote=If Iran is allowed to backtrack on its commitments now, it doesn’t bode well for compliance in the future. A vague, unverifiable deal won’t pass muster with the US Congress. If the nuclear deal needs a presidential veto to survive, then it may be too fragile to outlast this administration. That’s not in Iran’s interests, or the interests of the United States. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of | {{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|Plan is beneficial|mixed}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:19, July 17, 2015
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | The Boston Globe editorial board | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | The Boston Globe | |||
| Date | June 26, 2015 | |||
| URL | https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/06/26/hold-iranian-nuclear-negotiators-their-word/uP35OcR8lBwQiXNUrXjMiM/story.html# | |||
| Quote |
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item takes a mixed stance on the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.