Hold Iran nuclear negotiators to their word

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:46, July 15, 2015 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Boston Globe editorial board, |source=The Boston Globe |date=June 26, 2015 |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/06/26/hold-iranian-nucle...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Boston Globe editorial board
Source The Boston Globe
Date June 26, 2015
URL https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/06/26/hold-iranian-nuclear-negotiators-their-word/uP35OcR8lBwQiXNUrXjMiM/story.html#
Quotes-start.png If Iran is allowed to backtrack on its commitments now, it doesn’t bode well for compliance in the future. A vague, unverifiable deal won’t pass muster with the US Congress. If the nuclear deal needs a presidential veto to survive, then it may be too fragile to outlast this administration. That’s not in Iran’s interests, or the interests of the United States. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item takes a mixed stance on the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.