How not to deal with Iran

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:26, March 14, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Arthur Herman |source=New York Post |date=March 14, 2008 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/03142008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/how_not_to_deal_with_iran_101961.htm?page=0 |qu...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Arthur Herman
Source New York Post
Date March 14, 2008
URL http://www.nypost.com/seven/03142008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/how_not_to_deal_with_iran_101961.htm?page=0
Quote
Quotes-start.png "A manifestly divided and corrupt United Nations, a feckless and gun-shy intelligence establishment and an administration trying to use a kinder, gentler approach in the face of a gathering threat - that is a formula for trouble, if not disaster. Together, it all signals to any would-be aggressor that there will be no real consequences for defying the world, that Western-style diplomacy is only a fig leaf for weakness and indecision." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.