Human Rights Act 1998: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Categories => themes) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wikipedia}} | |||
{{ | {{Topic | ||
start date=November 9, 1998 | |start date=November 9, 1998 | ||
|Themes=United Kingdom domestic politics | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 06:44, November 28, 2007
- For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Human Rights Act 1998"
This is a topic, with start date November 9, 1998 and unknown end date.
Its theme(s) are United Kingdom domestic politics.
Summary of positions for this topic
- Act should be repealed (14 items)
Full listing
Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.
Act should be repealed
For
Natural justice needed - not 'human rights' by The Daily Telegraph editorial board (The Daily Telegraph, August 22, 2007) (view)
Good for crooks, bad for human rights by Daniel Hannan (The Daily Telegraph, November 16, 2006) (view)
It is time to protect the public's human rights by The Daily Telegraph editorial board (The Daily Telegraph, November 5, 2006) (view)
If we really want to escape the grip of human rights law we quit the EU by Melanie Phillips (Daily Mail, May 15, 2006) (view)
Basic freedoms are being lost in the human rights circus by Simon Jenkins (The Times, May 14, 2006) (view)
Against
Redemption, rehabilitation and basic human rights by The Independent editorial board (The Independent, August 22, 2007) (view)
It is absurd to calculate human rights according to a cost-benefit analysis by Ronald Dworkin (The Guardian, May 24, 2006) (view)
Let's not allow the battle of a Biro and an octopus to ruin an inspiring Act by David Aaronovitch (The Times, May 16, 2006) (view)
A shabby attempt to undermine human rights laws by The Observer editorial board (The Observer, May 14, 2006) (view)
All items that address this topic (14 total)