Improving heath care reform

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:44, June 2, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Tampa Bay Times editorial board, |source=Tampa Bay Times |date=May 31, 2013 |url=http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-improving-heath-care-refo...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Tampa Bay Times editorial board
Source Tampa Bay Times
Date May 31, 2013
URL http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-improving-heath-care-reform/2124110
Quote
Quotes-start.png Large employers who are capping hours at 29 per week to avoid the ACA should not get away with it. There needs to be a secondary formula for determining what constitutes a large employer that includes the part-time workforce in some fashion, at least for the purposes of the health insurance mandate and assessing the penalty, if not for providing coverage. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.