Intervention after Libya

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:33, September 1, 2011 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Guardian editorial board, |source=The Guardian |date=August 24, 2011 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/23/libya-foreign-policy-interven...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Guardian editorial board
Source The Guardian
Date August 24, 2011
URL http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/23/libya-foreign-policy-intervention
Quote
Quotes-start.png Libya was the classic "far-off country of which we know little". Except that this time, of course in very different circumstances, we decided to do our bit. Because it was a close argument, there should be no point-scoring now. Critics and supporters of the intervention should be able to join in agreeing that it was a close-run thing, that we are lucky it has turned out, so far, reasonably well, and that the story is far from over. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should not have intervened on the topic 2011 Libyan uprising.