Iran and the Inspectors

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:05, May 28, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=May 28, 2008 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/28/opinion/28wed2.html |quote="This latest report is ala...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date May 28, 2008
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/28/opinion/28wed2.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "This latest report is alarming, but it must not be used as an excuse by Washington hard-liners to launch another war. There are no good military options. The United States and the other major powers — Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany — have yet to put together a serious package of incentives and sanctions that might persuade Iran to change course. That must include a credible American offer of security guarantees and normalized relations if Tehran abandons any nuclear weapons ambitions." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.


This item argues for the position United States should negotiate with Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.