Jump to content

Iran deal deserves a chance

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:31, November 27, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board, |source=Los Angeles Times |date=November 26, 2013 |url=http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-iran-nuclear-interim-...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source Los Angeles Times
Date November 26, 2013
URL http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-iran-nuclear-interim-agreement-20131126,0,6511031.story#axzz2ls7yD98o
Quote
A lasting solution is, of course, ultimately the goal, but limited and temporary relief from sanctions may make it easier for the new government of President Hassan Rouhani to persuade Iran's hard-liners and religious leaders to support negotiations toward a permanent deal.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should not have signed agreement on the topic Geneva interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Iran_deal_deserves_a_chance&oldid=17080"