It's Time to Intervene in Syria: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=John Ju |source=The New Republic |date=April 30, 2013 |url=http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113068/syria-intervention-why-obama-should-authorize-force# |quote...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Item
{{Item
|author=John Ju
|author=John Judis,
|source=The New Republic
|source=The New Republic
|date=April 30, 2013
|date=April 30, 2013

Latest revision as of 19:16, April 30, 2013

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) John Judis
Source The New Republic
Date April 30, 2013
URL http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113068/syria-intervention-why-obama-should-authorize-force#
Quote
Quotes-start.png First, there is good reason to discourage—by force, if necessary—the use of chemical weapons. After 100,000 were killed in World War I from poison gas, the League of Nations in 1925 adopted a ban on their use, which even the adversaries in World War II observed. The United Nations adopted a ban of its own in 1992. Secondly, there is good reason for the United States, once it declares a “red line,” to observe it. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.