It's Up To Bush: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Item | ||
|author=Robert Kagan | |author=Robert Kagan, William Kristol | ||
|source=The Weekly Standard | |source=The Weekly Standard | ||
|date=December 8, 2006 | |date=December 8, 2006 | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
(or was it unwillingness?) to offer any remotely plausible suggestions for bringing security and stability to significant parts of Iraq. The Baker group instead chose to entertain the fantasy that political reconciliation in Iraq can take place in the absence of basic security for the average Iraqi." | (or was it unwillingness?) to offer any remotely plausible suggestions for bringing security and stability to significant parts of Iraq. The Baker group instead chose to entertain the fantasy that political reconciliation in Iraq can take place in the absence of basic security for the average Iraqi." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed|against}} | ||
{{Opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|for}} | |||
{{ |
Revision as of 12:22, March 30, 2009
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Robert Kagan, William Kristol |
---|---|
Source | The Weekly Standard |
Date | December 8, 2006 |
URL | http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/055vtxwr.asp |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.
This item argues for the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.