Judge Hudson's flawed but restrained ruling on the health law

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:27, December 17, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=December 13, 2010 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/13/AR2010...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date December 13, 2010
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/13/AR2010121305014.html
Quotes-start.png "As the Obama administration argued in defending the law, "No person can guarantee that he will divorce himself entirely from the market for health-care services." Even inaction, in this situation, affects economic activity and therefore interstate commerce." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.