Kill Keystone XL once and for all

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:51, February 25, 2015 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Rhea Suh, |source=USA Today |date=February 24, 2015 |url=http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/02/24/keystone-xl-natural-resources-defense-council-editoria...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Rhea Suh
Source USA Today
Date February 24, 2015
URL http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/02/24/keystone-xl-natural-resources-defense-council-editorials-debates/23966685/
Quote
Quotes-start.png Pipeline backers say the tar sands will be developed with or without Keystone. Not true. Over the past year, investors have scrubbed a million barrels a day in planned tar sands production, citing a lack of pipelines to move the product. Don't blame Americans for the shortage. The Canadians don't want a tar sands pipeline cutting across British Columbia and putting their ranches, farms, rivers and lands at risk. Why should we? Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.