Kim's Ka-boom: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New position)
(New position)
 
Line 8: Line 8:


{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|China should pressure North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions|for}}
{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|China should pressure North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions|for}}
{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|South Korea should pressure North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions|for}}
{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|Economic sanctions should be placed on North Korea|for}}
{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|Economic sanctions should be placed on North Korea|for}}
{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|United States should negotiate with North Korea|against}}
{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|United States should negotiate with North Korea|against}}

Latest revision as of 13:59, November 15, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New York Post editorial board
Source New York Post
Date October 10, 2006
URL http://www.nypost.com/seven/10102006/postopinion/editorials/kims_ka_boom_editorials_.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "At a bare minimum, China, Russia, Japan and South Korea need to be on the same page - that is, willing to impose draconian sanctions on Pyongyang until its nuclear adventure has ended, and to respond with appropriate force if the North lashes out in response." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position China should pressure North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions on the topic North Korean nuclear crisis.


This item argues for the position South Korea should pressure North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions on the topic North Korean nuclear crisis.


This item argues for the position Economic sanctions should be placed on North Korea on the topic North Korean nuclear crisis.


This item argues against the position United States should negotiate with North Korea on the topic North Korean nuclear crisis.