Labor move could backfire — on workers.

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 03:43, April 11, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed source)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Richard Hankins
Source The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Date March 2, 2007
Quotes-start.png "[Employers] may more frequently employ the lawful, but until now rarely used, tactic of "offensive lockouts" to pressure employees and their unions to accept a contract before the issue is placed in the unpredictable hands of a disinterested arbitrator. While the card check provisions of the Employee Free Choice Act might inflate union membership roles, the mandatory arbitration clause could devastate the very people those unions seek to represent." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Employee Free Choice Act.