Libya: The illusion of force: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Guardian editorial board, |source=The Guardian |date=March 10, 2011 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/10/libya-uprising-intervention |quot...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "enforce a no-fly zone" to "impose a no-fly zone") |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote=A no-fly zone could take until mid-April to put in place, by which time the situation on the ground could be very different. It would have less effect against helicopters, which are more lethal weapons in this form of combat, than it would have against jets, and as Ivo Daalder, the US ambassador to Nato acknowledged, overall air activity is not the deciding factor in the firefights between the rebels and regime loyalists and mercenaries. | |quote=A no-fly zone could take until mid-April to put in place, by which time the situation on the ground could be very different. It would have less effect against helicopters, which are more lethal weapons in this form of combat, than it would have against jets, and as Ivo Daalder, the US ambassador to Nato acknowledged, overall air activity is not the deciding factor in the firefights between the rebels and regime loyalists and mercenaries. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|2011 Libyan uprising|United States should | {{Opinion|2011 Libyan uprising|United States should impose a no-fly zone|against}} |
Latest revision as of 18:05, March 13, 2011
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | The Guardian editorial board |
---|---|
Source | The Guardian |
Date | March 10, 2011 |
URL | http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/10/libya-uprising-intervention |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position United States should impose a no-fly zone on the topic 2011 Libyan uprising.