Lieberman's Mistaken Idea of Who's Polarizing

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:05, October 5, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Christopher Durang
Source The Huffington Post
Date 8/8/2006
URL http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-durang/liebermans-mistaken-idea_b_26752.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Plus, of course, Lieberman doesn't "tiptoe" around the war issue - he actually supports the war in Iraq - still! -- and thinks it was the right thing to do, and he's in lock step with Bush on all of it. Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, but either Lieberman thinks he did, or he's a secret neo-con who thinks we should invade countries and bring them democracy by a gun. And so far that's working out real well in Iraq, isn't it?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Lamont should be elected on the topic Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006.


This item argues against the position Lieberman should be elected on the topic Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006.