Losing sleep over Iraq

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:20, July 18, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=San Francisco Chronicle editorial board |source=San Francisco Chronicle |date=July 18, 2007 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/07/18/EDGNNQ505K1.DTL ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) San Francisco Chronicle editorial board
Source San Francisco Chronicle
Date July 18, 2007
URL http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/07/18/EDGNNQ505K1.DTL
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Also Tuesday, the Washington Post reported that "war games" conducted for the U.S. military concluded that a withdrawal of American forces would not be "apocalyptic," according to the retired Marine colonel who oversaw them. The war games certainly painted a grim portrait of post-withdrawal Iraq -- which would effectively be split into three countries -- but far less dire than forecast by President Bush and his inner circle." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Coalition troops should pull out on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.