Moral Clarity in Gaza: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - '2008 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was justified in its attacks' to '2008-2009 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was right to attack Gaza')
m (Text replace - '2008-2009' to '2008–2009')
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="The grievance? It cannot be occupation, military control or settlers. They were all removed in September 2005. There's only one grievance and Hamas is open about it. Israel's very existence."
|quote="The grievance? It cannot be occupation, military control or settlers. They were all removed in September 2005. There's only one grievance and Hamas is open about it. Israel's very existence."
}}
}}
{{Opinion|2008-2009 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was right to attack Gaza|for}}
{{Opinion|2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was right to attack Gaza|for}}

Revision as of 21:53, January 5, 2009

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charles Krauthammer
Source The Washington Post
Date January 2, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/01/AR2009010101780.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The grievance? It cannot be occupation, military control or settlers. They were all removed in September 2005. There's only one grievance and Hamas is open about it. Israel's very existence." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict.