NSA warrantless surveillance controversy / Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (NSA warrantless surveillance controversy / Judge Taylor should have ruled program unconstitutional moved to NSA warrantless surveillance controversy / Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional: New style) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 02:23, August 19, 2006
Position: Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional
This position addresses the topic NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.
For this position
"Let's hope the higher courts do not allow the president to break the law" |
From Warrantless Wiretap Program in Doubt, by Helen Thomas (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, August 25, 2006) (view)
From ACLU v. NSA: "A Fearless and Independent Judiciary", by Geoffrey R. Stone (The Huffington Post, August 19, 2006) (view)
From Ruling for the Law, by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, August 18, 2006) (view)
From Wiretap ruling affirms that presidents aren't monarchs, by USA Today editorial board (USA Today, August 18, 2006) (view)
Against this position
From Crippling terrorist surveillance, by The Washington Times editorial board (The Washington Times, October 2, 2006) (view)
From Eavesdropping ruling a judicial farce, by Robert Novak (Chicago Sun-Times, August 28, 2006) (view)
From A law unto herself: Judge Taylor shows why Dems can't be trusted, by Jack Kelly (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, August 27, 2006) (view)
From War, law and justice, by David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee A. Casey (The Washington Times, August 24, 2006) (view)
From President Taylor, by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, August 18, 2006) (view)
"One of the serious weaknesses of our federal judicial system is that in many cases, plaintiffs can forum-shop for a favorable district or judge." |
From Judge Ignores Precedent, Holds NSA Program "Unconstitutional", by John Hinderaker (Power Line, August 17, 2006) (view)
Mixed on this position
From Eavesdropping within the law, by Chicago Tribune editorial board (Chicago Tribune, August 20, 2006) (view)
From Wiretap decision goes over the top, by Rocky Mountain News editorial board (Rocky Mountain News, August 19, 2006) (view)
From A Judicial Misfire, by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, August 18, 2006) (view)