No fixing Electoral College: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|url=http://www.denverpost.com/opinionheadlines/ci_5655087 | |url=http://www.denverpost.com/opinionheadlines/ci_5655087 | ||
|quote="If there were credible allegations of voter intimidation or fraud in some other state, would you want it to be able to determine where your state's electoral vote went? Probably not. There would be an outcry, and we'd be back to where we are now. The Electoral College has been a mess almost since Day One, but to date, the reform proposals demonstrate only one certainty: There's no good way to fix it." | |quote="If there were credible allegations of voter intimidation or fraud in some other state, would you want it to be able to determine where your state's electoral vote went? Probably not. There would be an outcry, and we'd be back to where we are now. The Electoral College has been a mess almost since Day One, but to date, the reform proposals demonstrate only one certainty: There's no good way to fix it." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|National Popular Vote Interstate Compact|Compact should be passed|against}} | {{Opinion|National Popular Vote Interstate Compact|Compact should be passed|against}} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:54, November 17, 2014
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Ed Quillen |
---|---|
Source | The Denver Post |
Date | April 13, 2007 |
URL | http://www.denverpost.com/opinionheadlines/ci_5655087 |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Compact should be passed on the topic National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.