Obama's Plan Isn't the Answer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Martin Feldstein |source=The Washington Post |date=July 28, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/27/AR2009072701905.html?sub=AR |...') |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act') |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="At a time when medical science offers the hope of major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of dread diseases, should Washington be limiting the available care and, in the process, discouraging medical researchers from developing new procedures and products? Although health care is much more expensive than it was 30 years ago, who today would settle for the health care of the 1970s?" | |quote="At a time when medical science offers the hope of major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of dread diseases, should Washington be limiting the available care and, in the process, discouraging medical researchers from developing new procedures and products? Although health care is much more expensive than it was 30 years ago, who today would settle for the health care of the 1970s?" | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion| | {{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should be passed|against}} |
Latest revision as of 14:37, March 11, 2010
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Martin Feldstein |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Post |
Date | July 28, 2009 |
URL | http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/27/AR2009072701905.html?sub=AR |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.