Obama's Plan Isn't the Answer: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Item |author=Martin Feldstein |source=The Washington Post |date=July 28, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/27/AR2009072701905.html?sub=AR |...')
 
m (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act')
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="At a time when medical science offers the hope of major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of dread diseases, should Washington be limiting the available care and, in the process, discouraging medical researchers from developing new procedures and products? Although health care is much more expensive than it was 30 years ago, who today would settle for the health care of the 1970s?"
|quote="At a time when medical science offers the hope of major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of dread diseases, should Washington be limiting the available care and, in the process, discouraging medical researchers from developing new procedures and products? Although health care is much more expensive than it was 30 years ago, who today would settle for the health care of the 1970s?"
}}
}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|against}}
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should be passed|against}}

Latest revision as of 14:37, March 11, 2010

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Martin Feldstein
Source The Washington Post
Date July 28, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/27/AR2009072701905.html?sub=AR
Quote
Quotes-start.png "At a time when medical science offers the hope of major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of dread diseases, should Washington be limiting the available care and, in the process, discouraging medical researchers from developing new procedures and products? Although health care is much more expensive than it was 30 years ago, who today would settle for the health care of the 1970s?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.