Obamacare cancellation blues

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:57, November 3, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board, |source=Los Angeles Times |date=November 1, 2013 |url=http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-health-policy-cancella...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source Los Angeles Times
Date November 1, 2013
URL http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-health-policy-cancellations-20131101,0,781858.story#axzz2jNvTO4l6
Quotes-start.png The essential benefits and cost limits are meant to prevent people with insurance from being bankrupted by medical bills — a distressingly common occurrence. But they're also part of a larger effort in the law to stop insurers from cherry-picking customers, leaving those who may need expensive treatments unable to find coverage. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.