On victory: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Alright, back to normal)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
|author=Jules Crittenden
|author=Jules Crittenden
|source=Boston Herald
|source=Boston Herald
|date=August 16, 2006
|url=http://news.bostonherald.com/editorial/view.bg?articleid=153142
|url=http://news.bostonherald.com/editorial/view.bg?articleid=153142
|date=
|quote="So Israel has settled for international acknowledgement that its actions in Lebanon were justified, and has agreed to cede control of the ground it seized there on condition that United Nations, Lebanon and France maintain control of it. Chalk up a pragmatic victory for Israel."
|quote="So Israel has settled for international acknowledgement that its actions in Lebanon were justified, and has agreed to cede control of the ground it seized there on condition that United Nations, Lebanon and France maintain control of it. Chalk up a pragmatic victory for Israel."
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 04:38, August 25, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jules Crittenden
Source Boston Herald
Date August 16, 2006
URL http://news.bostonherald.com/editorial/view.bg?articleid=153142
Quote
Quotes-start.png "So Israel has settled for international acknowledgement that its actions in Lebanon were justified, and has agreed to cede control of the ground it seized there on condition that United Nations, Lebanon and France maintain control of it. Chalk up a pragmatic victory for Israel." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.


This item argues for the position United Nations should disarm Hezbollah on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.