Picture IDs are perfectly sensible: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|date=September 28, 2006
|date=September 28, 2006
|url=http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/
|url=http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/
|quote="While Ireland undoubtedly has worked hard to purge dead people from the voter registration rolls, people still manage to cast ballots in the names of the dead. Requiring a photo ID would nip that in the bud. Another Democratic talking point is that some of the poor, the elderly and the disabled do not have photo IDs. But the state already issues photo IDs to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles."
|quote=to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles."
}}
}}
{{Opinion|sdfdasfasf||for}}
{{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}}
{{Opinion|2006 Dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy|Alberto Gonzales should be impeached|against}}
{{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}}
{{Reference|'Buy American' provisions offer recipe for retaliation}}
{{Reference|5B, keep the change}}
test111
test111

Revision as of 20:51, October 12, 2013

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charleston Daily Mail editorial board
Source Charleston Daily Mail
Date September 28, 2006
URL http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/
Quote
Quotes-start.png to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references

test111

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Picture_IDs_are_perfectly_sensible&oldid=16923"