Picture IDs are perfectly sensible: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
{{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}}
{{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}}
{{Opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Britain should negotiate with Hezbollah|mixed}}
{{Opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Britain should negotiate with Hezbollah|mixed}}
{{Opinion}}
{{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}}
{{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}}
{{Reference|'Historic' Stimulus Is Egregious Waste}}
{{Reference|'Historic' Stimulus Is Egregious Waste}}
{{Reference|Back to the future on energy}}
Testtext
Testtext

Revision as of 18:36, May 26, 2014

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charleston Daily Mail editorial board 2222
Source Charleston Daily Mail
Date September 28, 2006
URL http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/
Quote
Quotes-start.png "While Ireland undoubtedly has worked hard to purge dead people from the voter registration rolls, people still manage to cast ballots in the names of the dead. Requiring a photo ID would nip that in the bud. Another Democratic talking point is that some of the poor, the elderly and the disabled do not have photo IDs. But the state already issues photo IDs to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.


This item takes a mixed stance on the position Britain should negotiate with Hezbollah on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.


This item refers to the previous opinion item Keep Away the Vote.

This item refers to the previous opinion item 'Historic' Stimulus Is Egregious Waste.

This item refers to the previous opinion item Back to the future on energy. Testtext