Picture IDs are perfectly sensible: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}} | {{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}} | ||
{{Opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Britain should negotiate with Hezbollah|mixed}} | {{Opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Britain should negotiate with Hezbollah|mixed}} | ||
{{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}} | {{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}} | ||
{{Reference|'Historic' Stimulus Is Egregious Waste}} | {{Reference|'Historic' Stimulus Is Egregious Waste}} | ||
{{Reference|Back to the future on energy}} | |||
Testtext | Testtext |
Revision as of 18:36, May 26, 2014
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Charleston Daily Mail editorial board 2222 |
---|---|
Source | Charleston Daily Mail |
Date | September 28, 2006 |
URL | http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.
This item takes a mixed stance on the position Britain should negotiate with Hezbollah on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.
This item refers to the previous opinion item Keep Away the Vote.
This item refers to the previous opinion item 'Historic' Stimulus Is Egregious Waste.
This item refers to the previous opinion item Back to the future on energy. Testtext