Picture IDs are perfectly sensible: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Item
{{Item
|author=Charleston Daily Mail editorial board
|author=Scott Schnaars
|source=Charleston Daily Mail
|source=Charleston Daily Mail
|date=September 28, 2006
|date=September 28, 2006

Revision as of 05:09, October 17, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Scott Schnaars
Source Charleston Daily Mail
Date September 28, 2006
URL http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/
Quote
Quotes-start.png "While Ireland undoubtedly has worked hard to purge dead people from the voter registration rolls, people still manage to cast ballots in the names of the dead. Requiring a photo ID would nip that in the bud. Another Democratic talking point is that some of the poor, the elderly and the disabled do not have photo IDs. But the state already issues photo IDs to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles."

This is a test

Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references



Author(s) [[{{{author}}}]]
Author(s) 2 (a field set by the form) {{{author 2}}}
URL
Quote (a textarea string)
Start date
Circulation (an integer)
Publication type (a multiple-value enumeration)
First name
Email address (an email)
Is nice (a boolean)


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.


This item addresses the topic .


This item refers to the previous opinion item Keep Away the Vote.