Pressure for cease-fire must intensify: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=San Francisco Chronicle editorial board |source=San Francisco Chronicle |date=January 4, 2009 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/04/ED6I1514I9.DTL...) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - '2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict' to 'Gaza War') |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="It was Hamas, not Israel, that provoked war by breaking a cease-fire. And it was Hamas, not Israel, whose refusal to accept the other's right to exist created an intractable barrier to meaningful negotiation. All true. But the notion that Hamas could be bombed into sensibility is a little hard to imagine. The more likely reality is that the fallout of this bombing campaign is hardening the resolve of the militants that survive it, while generating international outrage at Israel's heavy-handedness." | |quote="It was Hamas, not Israel, that provoked war by breaking a cease-fire. And it was Hamas, not Israel, whose refusal to accept the other's right to exist created an intractable barrier to meaningful negotiation. All true. But the notion that Hamas could be bombed into sensibility is a little hard to imagine. The more likely reality is that the fallout of this bombing campaign is hardening the resolve of the militants that survive it, while generating international outrage at Israel's heavy-handedness." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion| | {{Opinion|Gaza War|Israel was right to attack Gaza|mixed}} |
Latest revision as of 17:44, July 14, 2009
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | San Francisco Chronicle editorial board |
---|---|
Source | San Francisco Chronicle |
Date | January 4, 2009 |
URL | http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/04/ED6I1514I9.DTL |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item takes a mixed stance on the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic Gaza War.