Profiles in Cowardice: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Reverted - new article is at new page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{item
|author=Andrew C. McCarthy
|author=The Washington Post editorial board
|source=Human Events
|source=The Washington Post
|date=February 15, 2008
|date=October 1, 2006
|url=http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25017
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/30/AR2006093001027.html
|quote="Denying immunity would not just be counterproductive -- creating disincentives for cooperation from the industry whose expertise provides us with a technology edge over the people trying to kill us. It would be grossly unfair and eventually prompt the industry to question all government directives -- even court orders -- for fear that compliance would lead to ruinous litigation costs."
|quote="Yet Mr. Bush's pressure tactics worked again. He has the lamentable legislation he wanted -- which will bring discredit onto this country in any number of ways -- and Republicans are busily blasting Democrats as terrorist-coddlers anyway."
}}
}}


{{opinion|Protect America Act of 2007|Act should be renewed|for}}
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Compromise bill should be passed|against}}

Latest revision as of 19:52, February 18, 2008

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date October 1, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/30/AR2006093001027.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Yet Mr. Bush's pressure tactics worked again. He has the lamentable legislation he wanted -- which will bring discredit onto this country in any number of ways -- and Republicans are busily blasting Democrats as terrorist-coddlers anyway." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Compromise bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.