Rules for the Real World: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Space)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
|date=September 20, 2006
|date=September 20, 2006
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/opinion/20wed1.html
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/opinion/20wed1.html
|quote="Both bills choke off judicial review and allow even those acquitted by a military tribunal to be held indefinitely. Either bill might be acceptable if the United States government were infallible. As it is, they would legalize the sorts of abuses of power that the United States fought against in other countries for most of the 20th century. "
|quote="Both bills choke off judicial review and allow even those acquitted by a military tribunal to be held indefinitely. Either bill might be acceptable if the United States government were infallible. As it is, they would legalize the sorts of abuses of power that the United States fought against in other countries for most of the 20th century."
}}
}}


{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|against}}
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|against}}
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|against}}
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|against}}

Latest revision as of 16:15, September 20, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date September 20, 2006
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/opinion/20wed1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Both bills choke off judicial review and allow even those acquitted by a military tribunal to be held indefinitely. Either bill might be acceptable if the United States government were infallible. As it is, they would legalize the sorts of abuses of power that the United States fought against in other countries for most of the 20th century." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.


This item argues against the position Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.