Rules for the Real World

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:10, September 20, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date September 20, 2006
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/opinion/20wed1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Both bills choke off judicial review and allow even those acquitted by a military tribunal to be held indefinitely. Either bill might be acceptable if the United States government were infallible. As it is, they would legalize the sorts of abuses of power that the United States fought against in other countries for most of the 20th century. " Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.


This item argues against the position Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.