Runaway Train To Less Freedom, Higher Taxes And Rationed Care

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:40, March 11, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Michael Leavitt
Source Investor's Business Daily
Date July 17, 2009
URL http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332725027738512
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The bill would increase income taxes by $583 billion. The White House says only the rich would be taxed. The truth is, this would be a tax on job creation. More than half of all those taxed would be small-business owners, and the taxes would be substantial. The White House projection that 5 million jobs would be lost doesn't even factor in the adverse effects of this tax, but money taken from the pockets of job creators inevitably leads to pink slips for employees." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.