Page values for "Second-Term Nightmare"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | July 29, 2013 1:41:11 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | July 29, 2013 1:41:11 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Pete du Pont, |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=July 27, 2013 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324564704578630432525651780.html |quote=Add sticker shock to the Democrats' concerns, with recent news of large ObamaCare-driven premium increases in the individual ma ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Second-Term Nightmare |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 8,531 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 8,531 |
| _pageName | Page | Second-Term Nightmare |
| _pageTitle | String | Second-Term Nightmare |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act | |
| Position_fragment | String | Act should not have been passed | |
| Position | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should not have been passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | for |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Pete du Pont |
| Source | Page | The Wall Street Journal |
| Date | Date | July 27, 2013 |
| URL | URL | http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324564704578630432525651780.html |
| Quote | Text | Add sticker shock to the Democrats' concerns, with recent news of large ObamaCare-driven premium increases in the individual market (for policyholders who do not get coverage through an employer). We were promised that if we liked our current insurance plan, we could keep it. States like Indiana (projected premium increase of 76%), Ohio (88%) and others confirm what many already knew—we cannot keep our current plan if it does not meet what the administration considers "acceptable," and moving to one that meets the ObamaCare requirements can be quite expensive. |
| Summary | Wikitext | Second-Term Nightmare by Pete du Pont (The Wall Street Journal, July 27, 2013) (view) |