Shelby County v. Holder
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Shelby County v. Holder"
This is a topic, with start date May 18, 2012 and unknown end date.
Its theme(s) are United States domestic politics.
Summary of positions for this topic
Full listing
Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.
Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act
For
Voting Rights Watershed by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, February 28, 2013) (view)
Voting rights showdown by The Washington Times editorial board (The Washington Times, February 27, 2013) (view)
Against
Voting rights are still vulnerable by The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board (The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 28, 2013) (view)
The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, February 26, 2013) (view)
Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete by The Baltimore Sun editorial board (The Baltimore Sun, February 26, 2013) (view)
All items that address this topic (7 total)
| Title | Author | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished | The Washington Post editorial board | The Washington Post | February 26, 2013 |
| Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete | The Baltimore Sun editorial board | The Baltimore Sun | February 26, 2013 |
| Voting rights showdown | The Washington Times editorial board | The Washington Times | February 27, 2013 |
| Voting rights are still vulnerable | The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board | The Philadelphia Inquirer | February 28, 2013 |
| Voting Rights Watershed | The Wall Street Journal editorial board | The Wall Street Journal | February 28, 2013 |
| In a rut on the voting rights act | George F. Will | New York Post | March 3, 2013 |
| Why we need the Voting Rights Act | Eddie Bernice Johnson | USA Today | March 7, 2013 |